Kazlev commits the same mistake that many others have succumbed to when he observes, “Heehs is an academic, not a gnostic, and therefore he is not in a position to understand the higher aspects of Sri Aurobindo's life and teachings.” Deriving characteristics of Heehs’ psychological make-up from a specialized biography that he has authored is methodologically erroneous. [TNM]
Tuesday, March 30, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
0 comments:
Post a Comment