Monday, January 07, 2013
Office bearers of Sri Aurobindo Society should quit Ashram
Machiavelli decoupled power from faith and Montesquieu pleaded for
separation of powers. Adam Smith sought to keep commerce free from all encumbrances.
But mankind is yet to arrive at an admirable combination of these
prescriptions. No perfect recipe can be said to have been hatched even after
multiple revolutions. The Mother & Sri Aurobindo, on the other hand, have
worked for a paradigm shift. The Five Dreams Manifesto broadcast on the eve of India ’s
independence outlines a definite blueprint for the future of humanity.
Apart from the Ashram, The Mother has set up several other organizations
and blessed many educational as well as commercial ventures. The purpose of all
these was to popularize an alternative source of inspiration for meaningful social
intercourse. The modality chosen was to stretch the ambit of High Culture to their
Spiritual peaks. The uplifting message touched many and a movement arose but
the needed purity is not to be had within a year or two. And hence the
necessity of diligent spadework involving the global network of devotees and
admirers.
Though created as an offshoot, the Sri Aurobindo Society has long
functioned as an adjunct of the Ashram. By being inmates, the office bearers of
the Society play a double role that, like bigamy, tends to be inimical to the interests
of the Ashram. The society, with its clout and outreach, cultivates patronage leading
to psychological scission and segregation among the Ashramites. Role hybridity generates
irreverence and critical attitude that proves to be subversive to the homogeneity and cohesiveness of the Ashram. On the other side, being tied to Ashram's apron strings, the Society
is deprived of the independence and the required initiative for achieving the
full potentials of its mandate.
Without any first hand experience of the inside functioning of both
the organizations, it can safely be said out of just common sense that the
office bearers of the Sri Aurobindo Society should quit the Ashram. Alternatively,
they should resign from being office bearers and allow others to steer the organization
founded by The Mother to the fruition of its clear goals. The principle of transparency
and accountability is a must and should not be applicable selectively. Once it
finds a foothold in Puducherry and Auroville, we can surely turn our gaze to the formidable regional
satraps.
The Mother, for practical reasons, stipulated that the inmates of Sri
Aurobindo Ashram shouldn't participate in active politics. The
Ashram, thus, is exclusively meant for practice of Integral Yoga. But, since
publishing is a major activity of the Ashram and some of its members are into
writing, it involves politics to a certain extent. The place of Sri Aurobindo
in the evolution of politics in modern India is significant and he has
left behind considerable amount of writing on political theory as well as
prophecy.
The establishment of Auroville, itself, is a testimony to the attempt
to create innovative models of collective living and giving shape to age old
political ideals dreamt by savants across cultures. In his broadcast of August
14, 1947, Sri Aurobindo even goes further to propose a World Union. Thus, both –
the political or the collective as well as the individual sadhana – aspects must
proceed side by side so that an integral portrayal of the legacy of The Mother
& Sri Aurobindo is presented. This dual concern is perhaps best conveyed by
Savitri Era which has been independently stimulating the public sphere since
Y2K. [TNM55]
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)

No comments:
Post a Comment