Amod Lele writes, “for Marx it was always the case that matter matters.” This may be true so far as “commodity fetishism” is
concerned, but to “understand that physical world” entails theorizing which is
not strictly matter. Philosophy of immanence, though immanent by definition,
has transcendental ramifications. This is, perhaps, the reason why Joshua Ramey’s book on Deleuze
has set the cat among the pigeons. [TNM55]
Showing posts with label Marx. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marx. Show all posts
Friday, February 22, 2013
Thursday, November 15, 2012
56 years of 1956
The
Mother’s proclamation of the descent of the Supramental in 1956 almost
coincided with the sweeping post-Independence hopes of building a new India . But what
we observe 56 years later is not a very encouraging scene on both the fronts.
Despite the democratic pretensions, politics, media, education, and leisure are
all hostage to a pervasive feudal culture. Instead of the Marxist angst and
alienation, a celebratory engrossing with Heideggerian inauthenticity and
trivia seems to be the order of the day. Commerce, of course, propels
excellence as well as quality of life. Patronage for arts and creativity, too,
are hinged to the invisible hand of market dynamics. Management of human
affairs has climbed such macro levels that ordinary human beings have become
inconsequential.
Labels:
Heidegger,
Marx,
Supramental,
The Mother and Sri Aurobindo
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)