I have written on this problem on many occasions in the past since understanding Sri Aurobindo and right interpretation of his writings is an enormous responsibility. But developing a systematic framework for it is nowhere in sight. As a result, learning about him is bound to remain as scattered and chaotic.
Scholarship had a very secure format in the last century. Writing some connecting notes to a bunch of select citations was the standard practice. Published texts were considered as authentic and, therefore, they were rarely questioned or challenged. Despite the concept of Deconstruction, it was, by and large, a safe world.
Arrival of Internet resulted in mushrooming of authors with texts multiplying, exponentially. Thus, the sanctity of the printed word was lost. Moreover, podcasts became difficult to quote or reference, although they added significantly to the discourse. AI generated slanted views, dressed in respectable prose, also are the latest irritant.
On the backdrop of these difficulties of general nature, studying Sri Aurobindo poses many other problems. Identifying them is essential for understanding the magnitude of the problem. Then only finding proper ways and means for addressing them can be thought of. But no assurance is there.
1. The name of Sri Aurobindo is almost synonymous with the Ashram. But this is an anomalous situation since it gives an impression of Sri Aurobindo being owned by the Ashram. Obviously, it is not a fact. Sri Aurobindo belongs to the history but history is yet to claim him adequately.
2. History has problem in grappling with Sri Aurobindo's various facets. It is not sure of some dimensions of his personality that have been amplified by public perceptions, at various levels. History is also ambivalent about the veracity of many utterances of top politicians and leaders about him.
3. More fundamentally, scholarship in our country is paradigm or narrative driven where Sri Aurobindo, virtually, has no place. If I'm correct, Sumit Sarkar had provided him a foothold in the history books which was later amplified a bit by Dipesh Chakrabarty. Still, it amounts to nothing. The damage done by Ashish Nandy persists.
4. Hindutva has done further damage by pigeonholing Sri Aurobindo as an icon of narrow nationalism. It is not interested any farther than that single sentence of his Uttarpara speech. Some are more interested in presenting him as a revolutionary and pioneer of militancy. These create a warped picture of him.
5. Overall, general scholarship on Sri Aurobindo is nearly absent. As a result, comparisons and comments are rare even in journalistic writings. Perceiving the Ashram as a cult is also a dampener. Many prefer maintaining silence instead of exposing their own ignorance of him. Distance from devotion is also construed as a sign of cerebral status.
6. Western approval is also a big factor in fostering scholarship but Sri Aurobindo is a pauper here too. Universities are loath to entertain him ever since Ken Wilber turned him New Agey. Appropriation by Hindutva is a further dissuading factor.
7. Indians in America too don't seem to be enthusiastic about Sri Aurobindo, much. They are more interested in the ritualistic model of religion than the Vedic consciousness driven, as formulated by Sri Aurobindo. Spectacle, after all, exerts universal pull.
Apart from such external factors, there are many reasons internal to Sri Aurobindo's own writings.
1. All of his writings and conversations are yet to be published due to which a complete understanding of him is still awaited.
2. Most of his books are independent of each other and, therefore, making proper connections is difficult.
3. His poetry, being religious and mystical, lacks the power for attracting young readers.
4. His philosophical writings contain immense speculation thus falling short of credibility before the present generation.
5. His life in the Ashram doesn't inspire confidence in the men of action busy in the struggle of life.
6. His system of Integral yoga involves large scale psychological manipulation which most find repulsive.
7. Many of Sri Aurobindo's admirers don't consider The Mother as worth respecting due to her foreign origin.
I must have posted several references to the book, but recently, I read a passage, via a tweet, from India and Europe by Wilhelm Halbfass which seemed to me to be a very precise and a very astute comment on Sri Aurobindo. In contrast to the latest skeptical review of Frank Visser, it offers a very optimistic portrayal of Sri Aurobindo's relevance.
However, I am skeptical of scholarship ever being capable of doing proper justice to Sri Aurobindo. I am equally skeptical of the theory that the truth can be known by mystical experiences. The mid-ground, therefore, is Savitri Era Religion. Those who feel that the young Indians in America have a different set of requirements than those at home are mistaken. Savitri Era Religion (2006) is amply universal to embrace the whole humanity. https://x.com/SavitriEra - https://bsky.app/profile/savitriera.bsky.social
Misc. References:
1. What is particularly noteworthy is that the ascent to new stages and dimensions of consciousness, the thrust into the “supramental” etc., is presented as a concrete historical task not limited to the inner world of the individual but involving the cosmos and mankind as well. Aurobindo is convinced that the spiritual realities can be made manifest in the actual, current world, and that in this process Hinduism can prove its concrete historical potential. -Halbfass, India and Europe
https://x.com/vjgtweets/status/2091591125731819821
https://auroramirabilis.blogspot.com/2026/08/hinduism-can-prove-its-concrete.html
2.
https://savitriera.blogspot.com/2026/08/senility-and-liminality.html
https://savitriera.blogspot.com/2026/08/savitri-and-life-divine-twin-towers.html
3. On Reading Sri Aurobindo: Blindness, Insight, Outlook and a Persprctive By Murali Sivaramakrishnan
https://selforum.blogspot.com/p/blog-page.html
https://youtu.be/j0ZTSJtZYVA?si=FLWQvZ1iljyUKgaz
https://youtu.be/GMic9scZ8UY?si=bspN-bzkcLnB0Rro
[Professor Murali Sivaramakrishnan receiving Sri Aurobindo Puraskar on 15th August 2026 from the Governor of West Bengal in Kolkata... Congratulations to Murali, who is also an environmentalist. @lokbhavan_wb] - GG
No comments:
Post a Comment